Antibiotics are wonderful drugs. Used properly, they can help a body rebuild from severe disease that could otherwise end a life. Modern medical procedures include culturing infections to determine if the bacterium involved is gram positive or negative, and its specific make up. This information is a guiding principle in determining the most effective drug. Some bacteria, for example, have particularly strong cell walls, and a certain class of drug targets that strength. It has also been discovered that antibiotics can have reduced or nullified effects if the patient is on the birth control pill or consumes alcoholic beverages. Taking a proper patient history and sufficient lab work is important for proper administration of antibiotics. A quick “I have a sore throat”…”Here, take this” just doesn’t provide the information needed for a good antibiotic match. Each antibiotic that is overused to the point that it is no longer effective represents one missing tool in the arsenal of doctors to combat serious illness.

If these amazing drugs were administered properly, at the right time to those in need, we might be still enjoying their benefits. Unfortunately, for many years these wonder drugs were given to children when they fell ill with viruses: something the drugs have no effect on whatsoever. Their mothers, having heard stories of their great-grandparents’ lives being saved by these new antibiotics would bring the child to the doctor and insist “something be done.” The doctor, to placate the mom and move on with his hectic schedule, would write the prescription. By the time it was filled and administered, the virus would run its course and Mama would laud the effectiveness of the drug to her friends, who would queue up their children at the pediatrician for some of the wonder pills.

Then, these immune-suppressed children would get a case of bronchitis after every cold, so antibiotics would be prescribed early on to “prevent secondary infection.” Sure enough, any cold without these prophylactic drugs would go into bronchitis or pneumonia, further proving their need and desirability. It has not been until the last ten years that doctors have been officially warned to not prescribe antibiotics until they are certain of the need.

As a child, I was beset my a string of infections. Swimmer’s ear would set in, not just when I swam, but every time I got my head wet. Tonsillitis ate away at my throat at the change of every season. All my colds wound down into bronchitis. Never once during my years on antibiotics was I told that I should continue bedrest for the full course of the medication, something many doctors now realize is important to allow the body to rid itself completely of pathogens. As a matter of fact, I was usually released back to school the same day I got my prescription for antibiotics.

During one particularly difficult year in high school, I came down with mononucleosis. As I was recovering, my throat became too painful to even swallow water. Doctor after doctor was mystified as my fever rose above 102° for days on end. I developed an allergic reaction to penicillin, the old standby from my ear infection days, then erythromycin, then tetracycline, then cephalasporin, as each drug was attempted in succession to stem the tide of the hiding infection. Eventually the problem area was discovered: an abscess hiding behind a tonsil. A culture came back: antibiotic-resistant strep.

We had never heard of such a thing. It was only 1973, and the news of antibiotic-resistant strains was just breaking. After a week of hospitalization, trying one drug after another and dealing with the each anaphylactic reaction, my body was close to calling it quits. A new “experimental” antibiotic was tried, which finally worked. I wish I had cared at that point to note the drug that finally brought down the mighty bug, but I was just glad to be eating and drinking again. My case was unusual in those days, but it is becoming a much more common scenario in the 21st century.

Antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria are on the rise worldwide. Even more dangerous than antibiotics being poorly prescribed is the now common practice of antibiotic-laced animal feed. While it’s true that CAFO animals are delicate and are given antibiotics to prevent deadly infection over the course of their short, miserable lives, there is also evidence that these animals are given antibiotic treatment because it makes them gain weight more quickly. And, in a news article from this weekend, a couple cows that could have ended up on your dinner plate were discovered to have been drugged with 129 times the legal limit of antibiotics. Clearly, some of the misuse is not for the good of the animal, but for the good of the profit of the CAFO owner. Up to 70 percent of U.S. antibiotics go to animals raised on industrial farms that aren’t sick.

In a CAFO system, the close quarters, weakened immune system of the animals and poor sanitation all provide perfect breeding grounds for pathogens. Bacteria are tough little buggers and make it their life mission to mutate in order to survive the antibiotics given their hosts. There now exists in the world variants of bacteria that did not exist several decades ago. And the ammunition we use to keep them from killing us is useless against some of these new strains.

Four separate sessions of Congress have addressed this issue repeatedly since 2003, the bill has died as many times. HR1549, the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act of 2009 is now in committee. Here is a copy of the bill, and a webpage from which you can track the act as it moves (or dies) through the legislative process. I will reserve comment on the bill at this time, but you should go and read through it to see if you think it deserves your support.

In the meantime, there is a great alternative to antibiotic-laced beef, chicken, pork and eggs. Get to know your local meat producers. Go to Local Harvest, your health food store’s manager, a nearby Weston A. Price Foundation leader, a farmer’s market. Talk to people. Tell them you’re looking for clean, grassfed meat, pastured poultry and eggs. Then when you meet the farmer, ask questions. What antibiotics does he use? When? Why? How? Talk. Ask. Decide.

This post is part of Prevention Not Prescriptions.

Teflon Cookware, 1960's by Roadsidepictures, on Flickr

In her book, The Body Toxic, Nena Baker made a shocking statement:

DuPont has let Teflon-covered cookware take the heat…

It’s a kind of bait-and-switch that, so far, has saved DuPont a lot of trouble over the thornier issue with fluorotelomers that has scientists and regulators on alert…

I picked up the book first, based on its subtitle: “How the Hazardous Chemistry of Everyday Things Threatens Our Health and Well-being”, and secondly because of the cover photo of an egg frying on a scratched Teflon pan. In it, I found investigative reporting on a par with Gary Taubes’ Good Calories, Bad Calories, and enough eighteen letter words to boggle my brain pretty well.

The ultimate conclusion the author makes is that DuPont is throwing Teflon to the wolves (even though sales of Teflon-coated pans continue to rise steadily) to keep the regulators off their back about their far worse uses of PFOA. I gotta say although it’s disappointing, I’m not terribly surprised. With a full 1/27th of their revenues dependent on PFOA, regulation or prohibition would do them serious harm. But what harm is already being done to us?

According to the Environmental Working Group:

Available data suggest that non-stick pans are not a major source of PFOA in people’s bodies. These exposures are more likely to come from stain- and grease-proof coatings on furniture, clothing, and food packaging.

Maybe it’s not just Teflon pans we need to concern ourselves with, but food containers that use a Teflon coating (think pizza boxes, fast food burger boxes, etc.) and moreover, the manufacture of these products.

No, I’ll never own another Teflon-coated piece of cookware. I don’t need it. Using a hot pan, cold food and real fat pretty much keeps food from sticking anyway. But it’s fascinating to me that what scares us real food cooks so much could turn out to be just another diversionary tactic.

Ignore that man behind the curtain…

This post is part of Fight Back Fridays hosted by Food Renegade.

This article in the Los Angeles Times really irked me. I know there are bloggers who buy into the whole “factory food” system. I know this because there are ordinary people who buy the food, and ordinary people who blog. The two groups must overlap at some point.

But megafood producers sending blogging moms on junkets? When did that become part of a marketing budget? Word of mouth has been a time-honored advertising method for about as long as ants have crawled the earth. But at some point, honesty must prevail. If the food that sparks your review was given to you free of charge by its producer, it’s only reasonable to expect that bit of info to appear in your review.  If you are sent on a junket to discover the glorious health benefits of Cocoa Puffs, you should say so.

I want to draw your attention to two things on my blog: First, the statement in bold at the bottom of the “About the Local Nourishment Site” page:

I accept no payment or gifts for the articles which appear on my blog. I do not participate in services providing advertising revenue for the products or programs I profile on my blog.


If, at some point, I accept a payment, gift or free sample that influences a review, I will remove this statement from my “about me” page and it will never return. I feel pretty strongly about that. I also feel strongly about being drawn into a blog page that promises important information and find it to be just another sales pitch. One site using that practice has lost this reader forever.

Second, on the left you will see this badge:

BlogWithIntegrity.com

Blog with Integrity realizes there is no one right way to blog, but encourages bloggers to avoid the theft of intellectual property, treat each other with respect, offer full disclosure to our readers and take responsibility for our words.

Here’s the statement I’ve signed:

BLOG with INTEGRITY

By displaying the Blog with Integrity badge or signing the pledge, I assert that the trust of my readers and the blogging community is important to me.

I treat others respectfully, attacking ideas and not people. I also welcome respectful disagreement with my own ideas.

I believe in intellectual property rights, providing links, citing sources, and crediting inspiration where appropriate.

I disclose my material relationships, policies and business practices. My readers will know the difference between editorial, advertorial, and advertising, should I choose to have it. If I do sponsored or paid posts, they are clearly marked.

When collaborating with marketers and PR professionals, I handle myself professionally and abide by basic journalistic standards.

I always present my honest opinions to the best of my ability.

I own my words. Even if I occasionally have to eat them.

That’s what’s on my mind today.

I’m not just learning about the foods we eat and how they affect our bodies, I’m also learning about the health and beauty items we purchase. Some contain ingredients that don’t do our bodies any good, others contain things that are just downright harmful.

For this week’s Prevention Not Prescriptions blog carnival, I offer this archived post about the mouth rinse we use and how it came to be.

No More Morning Breath

This post is part of the Prevention Not Prescriptions blog carnival.

first married meal by tempophage

Readers, Heather needs help!

My problem is the saboteur is in my own house in the form of a husband. Lets just say that he is having trouble considering food from a nourishing healthy point of view, and is still stuck in the habits from his childhood. Currently if I open my cupboard there are frosted flakes in it ARG! He is scared of raw milk. He will eat an entire bag of Doritoes. Meanwhile, I’m fermenting and soaking and growing vegetables in the back yard. Praying the whole time that he’ll become more adventurous, maybe just give it a try….Anyone have suggestions for a resistant husband?

I’ve been really blessed in our real food journey. My husband has been on board most of my wild dietary changes. It’s true that not everything I cook is gourmet quality (pretty large understatement here), and it’s a far cry from the food of his youth, but he’s agreed to at least taste almost everything I make. He hasn’t gone the kombucha/kefir/yogurt route with us, but he’s fine with raw milk and fermented relishes in small portions.

I’ve overcome some resistance from the kids, but I think they are easier to convince than a husband. I mean, it’s Mom’s food or PB&J here, I don’t cook separately for anyone. When they start to feel better, have more energy and sharper minds, they notice right away. And, I can make healthy eating a school subject. Once you start hearing the evidence for a real food diet, the objections really start to dissipate. But that’s kids: husbands sometimes don’t like to be told evidence or be forced into eating strange meals.

Part of the problem with getting adults to make healthy dietary changes is that food is all wrapped up in our emotions. You’re bucking years of mornings spent sharing sleepy conversation with Tony the Tiger and cheering on his home team with the uniquely addictive crunch of Doritos. You’re also probably not cooking the way his Mom used to (unless he’s over 50 years old). If your home diet changes too much or too quickly, he might be terrified to think that these cherished food traditions will disappear from his life.

One piece of advice I heard seems to fit very well here: Pick the thing he eats most often and make a small change with that. I think a grown man would appreciate being asked first, not “surprised,” but that depends on the personality of your husband. You don’t want to lose his trust. Food is just food, it’s not worth risking a marriage over.

If your husband is a meat and potatoes eater, trying grassfed beef and pork over CAFO meat would be a terrific starting point. If he likes eggs, switching to eggs from pastured chickens is easy. It’s hard to imagine a man who would honestly prefer the taste of margarine over butter, but I suppose there’s one out there somewhere. And other changes, like cooking with sea salt and coconut oil rather than canola or corn, in my opinion, are “chef’s prerogative” and not something he necessarily needs to know or approve.

If your husband has a “hot issue” you might want to do some research and see if you can present your best case (one time: no nagging) from that angle. If he’s concerned about the environment, for example, you could mention how a real food diet creates less trash and discourages the corn monocropping that’s destroying our soil.

Over time, your best weapon will be the taste of the food you prepare. Delicious food is hard to resist, even if it’s not what he’s used to.

Readers, I hope you will share your best tips here for Heather. It’s important to have the support of your life partner in a real food lifestyle. What have you done to encourage your spouse down the road to real food?

This post is part of Fight Back Fridays, hosted by Food Renegade.

Fight back friday food renegade fist

eggs in cream by Francesca Tronchin

eggs in cream by Francesca Tronchin

So, scientists have set out to make a healthy ice cream, they tell me. I hope they have as much fun testing their as we have ours. See, the way we make it, ice cream is full of good, healthy fats. It’s rich with real, whole RAW cream and egg yolks, and flavored with homemade vanilla and just a nip of pure maple syrup for sweetness. We’ve been having this treat as our once-a-week dessert all summer and long into fall. It’s been different each week because we mess around with toppings and add-ins. One week we’ll steep mint leaves into the milk and have mint. The next week, fresh peaches from the farmer’s market will cradle a scoop. Chocolate chips are always welcome. I’ll post my recipe below, but let’s take a quick look at this new “bionic ice cream” scientists hope to deliver.

First big mistake: Take the good stuff out

Why would you want to mess with ice cream? Well, if you perceive fat from egg and milk sources as evil, and if you’ve abandoned less-processed sugars for highly refined ones, and if the food is full of artificial colors, flavorings and preservatives, you have an end product that is not health-promoting. That “food” (and I use the term loosely) needs improving upon.

Second big mistake: Put the fake stuff in

But real ice cream, made at home in your own kitchen with real food? That’s about as functional as it gets. No need to add probiotics because raw cream is full of them. No need to add antioxidants because pastured chicken egg yolks already contain them.

Third big mistake: Mess with the food only as a marketing ploy

Mass produced, hyper-processed ice cream really is bad for us. We really can just say no to eating it. But real ice cream is a healthy food when eaten in reasonable serving sizes and as an occasional treat. There’s just no reason to mess with it. Oh, wait…money.

Gruen and his colleagues chose the added ingredients because they have been shown to contribute to a person’s health and also because they are familiar to consumers.Gruen said people buy a food for two reasons: either because they really enjoy the food or because it’s good for them. If the researchers were to add foreign, albeit beneficial, ingredients, consumers might pass right by the treat. “We’re trying to hit the big three, so to speak, of what consumers know about,” Gruen told LiveScience.

(Emphasis mine.) The “big three” Gruen refers to are probiotics, antioxidants and dietary fiber. So, in other words, childhood obesity is a serious problem, but you can feel good about feeding your kids this dreck because it has these scientific-sounding words that you’ve been told are good! Yeah? NO!

With the recipe we make, there is a whopping big total of 1 tablespoon of maple syrup per serving. That’s not a lot for a dessert (it’s less than some breakfast cereals, for heaven’s sake) and it really is enough. I want to encourage you to try this recipe with this morning’s pastured chicken eggs, cream skimmed from this morning’s milking and real Vermont maple syrup. This recipe makes a quart, which is eight half-cup servings. If you’re used to eating a pint of Ben and Jerry’s, a half cup of this gem will probably satisfy you.

Homemade Vanilla Ice Cream
4 egg yolks from pastured hens
1/2 cup real maple syrup (we’re not talking maple topping here, folks)
1 tablespoon organic vanilla extract
1 tablespoon potato starch
3 cups whole, raw, fresh cream

Whisk egg yolks and blend in syrup. Drizzle in vanilla while whisking. Sprinkle starch evenly over the top of eggs and blend in. Whisk in cream. Pour into bowl and let rest, covered, in the refrigerator for an hour or more. Pour into ice cream freezer and process according to manufacturer’s instructions. When frozen, scoop into a glass bowl, cover and store in freezer. I take the bowl out about 10 minutes before serving to make scooping easier.

This post is part of Real Food Wednesdays, hosted by Kelly the Kitchen Kop, a fellow ice cream lover!

th_rfw_orange3

Efficient menu by andreasmarx

(Rant warning) It’s not that I don’t understand. I have a larger-than-average family to feed. Of the seven of us, three are teenagers that seem to eat their weight in whatever they can lay hands on daily. We’ve also been self-employed for the past 18 months since being laid off; working six-day weeks to scrape by on freelance assignments paid hourly, just making the mortgage, doing without health insurance, cutting back further and further on what we once considered necessities. Our income dropped by 2/3 in 2008 and here, at the end of 2009, is still running 1/3 less than we made just two years ago.

When I say our food budget is a full fourth of our income (that’s 25%, compared to the 9-11% the average American spends) it’s not because we’re eating expensive food, it’s because I have mindfully and carefully chosen the food my growing children eat to be one of my top priorities regardless of the insufficiency of our income. We keep a roof over our heads and health-supporting food on our table. If we wear last decade’s clothes with a few mended holes, we can deal with that because clothes are for covering and warmth here. Shoes provide protection from the elements in our house, they aren’t fashion statements. Our car is a servant that provides transportation from point A to B, it is not a commentary on our political or sociological views. We all make choices and these are some of mine.

Everyone has to make their own choices, of course. But assuming healthy food is out of your economic reach without actually doing the math or choosing not to make informed choices is selling yourself short.

So when I read that the economy has “forced” families to choose less healthy options at the grocery store, I get a little riled. There are so many better ways to eat inexpensively besides going for the lunch of chips and Coke. From the above article:

Mintel, the market research firm, is tracking double-digit sales gains for salty snacks as well as popcorn and cheese snacks this year. Potato chip sales are up 22 percent this year compared with 2007 while tortilla chips sales are rising 18 percent.

To me, these increases mean that more Americans are turning to Frito Lay as the basis for a meal. Lunch becomes the chip and soda as the more expensive sandwich and and less filling soup fall to the wayside. Junk food Snack food companies are reporting record years.

There is a better way.

If you, or someone whose health is important to you, is challenged financially, take heart. There are some great options for less expensive food that is still nourishing. Here are some examples:

In short, there are just too many great options to fall into the frozen pizza/chips/kool aid trap. Nourishing your body is something you have to do. You can’t just “turn off service” like you would a phone or TV to save a few bucks. There are long-term consequences to feeding yourself poorly for an extended period of time. Children’s bodies suffer most: with lack of concentration, poor growth and bad habits formed that will be hard to break. Some deficiencies can cause problems for several generations beyond our own. Let’s not spend fifteen minutes chatting with our spouses about tonight’s TV schedule then open a can of soup because we don’t have time to chop a vegetable or two and add it to homemade broth. (Rant over, thank you for your patience.)

This post is part of Fight Back Friday, hosted by the ever rebellious but rarely ranting Food Renegade.

Fight back friday food renegade fist

Proper British Now - Day 55 by MarkAllanson, on Flickr

Yes, you read that right. Turns out…

The study showed that children who drink full-fat milk every day weigh on average just over 4 kg less.

As a matter of fact…

Children who often drink milk with a fat content of 3% are less overweight. The thesis shows also that the children eat more saturated fat than recommended, but those children who have a high intake of fat have a lower BMI than the children with a lower intake of fat.

Now, isn’t that interesting? Gee, fat intake, and specifically saturated fat intake doesn’t seem to correlate to obesity. Hm. I wonder if doctors and dietitians read Science Daily.

This post is part of the Prevention, not Prescriptions blog carnival.

 

Butternut Squash Gratin

In my continuing quest to use all the winter squash provided by my CSA, I stumbled across a recipe that didn’t sound half bad. With a few tweaks, it would do the trick quite nicely.

It’s a well known principle in our family that to get the kids to eat something, just cover it in cheese. This dish turned out so well that I could see it at our Thanksgiving table easily. It was sweet and savory, gooey and melty, and had just the right “punch” from the rosemary. I served it with salmon and kale. It did take a two-step cooking process, something I’m for the most part against for daily cooking, but the end product was very much worth the trouble.

Butternut Squash Gratin
2 tablespoons coconut oil, plus extra for casserole prep
1 tablespoon pastured butter
1 small yellow onion, diced
2 cloves garlic, minced
1 two-pound butternut squash, peeled, seeded and cut into 1/2 inch chunks
1 teaspoon real maple syrup
1 cup chicken broth
8 ounces each shredded Havarti and extra-sharp Cheddar
2 bread heels, whirred in blender to crumb
1 tablespoon stripped and chopped fresh thyme
1 tablespoon stripped and chopped fresh rosemary

Preheat oven to 350° and rub a 9×13″ casserole dish with coconut oil. Melt butter and coconut oil in a large skillet over medium heat. Stir in the onions and cook until they caramelize. Really take your time here and let them develop a light brown (they will continue to caramelize in the next step). This took me about 13 minutes. Add the squash and cook about 8 minutes until it is browned on the outside but still pretty firm in the center. Add minced garlic and maple syrup and cook, stirring, 2 minutes more. Put squash mixture into prepared baking dish. Pour chicken broth over squash and bake, covered for 40-45 minutes.

Stir together the breadcrumbs, chopped herbs and two cheeses. Cover the squash evenly with this mixture and return to the oven, uncovered this time, for about 15 minutes, or until topping is very lightly browned. This made 10 very generous servings.

This post is part of Twister Tuesday, hosted by Gnowfglins, the Make it From Scratch carnival and Real Food Wednesdays, hosted this week by Cheeseslave.

Tuesday twisterth_rfw_orange3

Here’s a blast from the past! My daughter has battled hand eczema for several years now. Although we are winning the war, there are still skirmishes where her hands crack, peel and bleed. Since the original post, we have added a daily dose of kombucha to her diet. Without further ado, this week’s entry into the Prevention Not Prescriptions blog carnival:

Nutritional Healing for Allergic Dermatitis

What Came Before

Click Here to Find Your Local Harvest!